Journal article
IEEE Open Journal of Nanotechnology, 2024
APA
Click to copy
Sehgal, A., Saini, S., Nehete, H., Das, K. K., Roy, S., & Kaushik, B. K. (2024). Multitask Learning for Estimation of Magnetic Parameters Using Pattern Recognition. IEEE Open Journal of Nanotechnology.
Chicago/Turabian
Click to copy
Sehgal, Anubha, Shipra Saini, Hemkant Nehete, Kunal Kranti Das, Sourajeet Roy, and Brajesh Kumar Kaushik. “Multitask Learning for Estimation of Magnetic Parameters Using Pattern Recognition.” IEEE Open Journal of Nanotechnology (2024).
MLA
Click to copy
Sehgal, Anubha, et al. “Multitask Learning for Estimation of Magnetic Parameters Using Pattern Recognition.” IEEE Open Journal of Nanotechnology, 2024.
BibTeX Click to copy
@article{anubha2024a,
title = {Multitask Learning for Estimation of Magnetic Parameters Using Pattern Recognition},
year = {2024},
journal = {IEEE Open Journal of Nanotechnology},
author = {Sehgal, Anubha and Saini, Shipra and Nehete, Hemkant and Das, Kunal Kranti and Roy, Sourajeet and Kaushik, Brajesh Kumar}
}
Machine learning (ML) approaches present an effective technique for accurately and efficiently predicting device parameters. Using these techniques, we introduce a multi-task convolutional neural network (CNN) model and support vector regression (SVR) model that is intended to precisely estimate two important parameters of magnetic systems such as the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction (DMI) constant and the exchange constant (Aex). The magnetic Hamiltonian encapsulates various energy components, including exchange energy, DMI, Zeeman energy, and anisotropy energy, wherein factors such as saturation magnetization, DMI strength, exchange stiffness, and anisotropy constants influence their magnitudes. Conventionally, the estimation of these parameters has been computationally intensive and time-consuming. The CNN and SVR models can simultaneously estimate both the DMI constant and the exchange constant, making it a versatile tool for magnetic system characterization. The custom CNN model performs best for the DMI constant and Aex with R2 scores of 0.991 and 0.998 respectively. The SVR model achieves R2 scores of 0.927 and 0.989 for DMI constant and Aex respectively. The estimated values are in good agreement with true values, thus emphasizing the potential of ML methods for pattern recognition.